文章摘要
张永彬,朱国良,张腾达,付学敏,张锐英.卷筒纸印刷机纸带磁粉制动张力控制优化设计[J].包装工程,2021,42(7):202-208.
ZHANG Yong-bin,ZHU Guo-liang,ZHANG Teng-da,FU Xue-min,ZHANG Ru-yin.Optimal Design of Magnetic Powder Brake Tension Control for Web Press[J].Packaging Engineering,2021,42(7):202-208.
卷筒纸印刷机纸带磁粉制动张力控制优化设计
Optimal Design of Magnetic Powder Brake Tension Control for Web Press
投稿时间:2020-09-02  
DOI:10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2021.07.027
中文关键词: 卷筒纸印刷机  磁粉制动  纸带张力控制  优化设计
英文关键词: Web press  Magnetic particle brake  tension control of paper tape  optimization design
基金项目:安徽省教育厅自然科研(重点)项目(KJ2018A0921,KJ2018A0924);安徽省教育厅教学研究(重大)项目(2020jyxm0815);安徽新闻出版职业学院思政课程项目(PX1222040)
作者单位
张永彬 安徽新闻出版职业技术学院合肥 230601 
朱国良 安徽安泰新型包装材料有限公司合肥 230061 
张腾达 安徽新闻出版职业技术学院合肥 230601 
付学敏 安徽新闻出版职业技术学院合肥 230601 
张锐英 安徽新闻出版职业技术学院合肥 230601 
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      目的 优化卷筒纸印刷机纸带磁粉制动张力控制系统,降低张力控制系统响应时间、超调量、调节时间,提高系统抗干扰能力,提高纸带张力控制效果。方法 在纸带张力常规PID控制器基础上,引入制动器滞后补偿环节,利用Simulink仿真软件,设计出补偿PID控制器,分别对常规PID控制器和补偿PID控制器开展仿真分析。结果 得到常规PID控制器单位阶跃响应参数,上升时间tr=0.75 s,超调量σ=9.5%,调节时间ts=2.812s,稳态误差es=0.001。得到补偿PID控制器单位阶跃响应,上升时间tr=0.40 s,超调量σ=6.7%,调节时间ts=1.962 s,稳态误差es=0。仿真15,10 s时引入扰动信号后,常规PID控制器在3.04 s回归稳态;补偿PID控制器在1.21 s回归稳态。结论 通过仿真分析,对比阶跃响应参数和干扰后回归速度,可知补偿PID控制器的动态性能优于常规PID控制器,控制纸带纸力性能较好,为优化卷筒纸印刷机张力控制提供了理论指导。
英文摘要:
      Optimize the magnetic powder brake tension control system of web press, reduce the response time, overshoot and adjustment time of the tension control system, improve the anti-interference ability of the system and improve the tension control effect of the paper tape. The methods based on the conventional PID controller of paper tape tension, the brake lag compensation link was introduced, and the compensation PID controller was designed by using Simulink simulation software, and the simulation analysis was carried out for the conventional PID controller and the compensation PID controller respectively. The unit step response parameters of the conventional PID controller were:tr = 0.75s, σ=9.5%, ts=2.812 s, es=0.001; the unit step response of the compensation PID controller was tr=0.40 s, σ=6.7%, ts=1.962 s, es=0. The simulation results show that the conventional PID controller returns to steady state in 3.04 seconds and the compensation PID controller returns to steady state in 1.21 seconds after introducing disturbance signal in 10 seconds. Through simulation analysis, comparing the step response parameters and the regression speed after disturbance, the dynamic performance of the compensation PID controller is better than that of the conventional PID controller, and the performance of controlling the paper force of the paper tape is better, which provides theoretical guidance for optimizing the tension control of web press.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

关于我们 | 联系我们 | 投诉建议 | 隐私保护 | 用户协议

您是第21275694位访问者    渝ICP备15012534号-2

版权所有:《包装工程》编辑部 2014 All Rights Reserved

邮编:400039 电话:023-68795652 Email: designartj@126.com

    

渝公网安备 50010702501716号