林铭香,林勤保,黄玮彬.两种复合软管生产过程的环境影响评价[J].包装工程,2021,42(3):121-127.
LIN Ming-xiang,LIN Qin-bao,HUANG Wei-bin.Environmental Impact Assessment of Two Kinds of Laminate Tube in Production[J].Packaging Engineering,2021,42(3):121-127. |
| 两种复合软管生产过程的环境影响评价 |
| Environmental Impact Assessment of Two Kinds of Laminate Tube in Production |
| 投稿时间：2020-04-15 |
| DOI：10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2021.03.017 |
| 中文关键词: 牙膏 包装 铝塑复合软管 全塑复合软管 生命周期评价 能耗 环境影响 |
| 英文关键词: toothpaste packaging aluminum barrier laminate tube plastic barrier laminate tube life cycle assessment energy consumption environmental impacts |
| 基金项目:林铭香(1982—)，女，暨南大学在职硕士生，主攻口腔护理产品的包装材料和包装设计。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: |
| 全文下载次数: |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 分别研究用于牙膏包装铝塑复合软管和全塑复合软管的4个生产单元对环境的影响，为此类型包装材料对环境影响的评估以及工艺改进提供参考。方法 采用生命周期评价方法定性定量地分析其对能耗和环境的影响，通过eFootprint软件，在线完成全生命周期评价，包括建模、计算分析和数据质量评估。结果 2种产品对初级能源消耗、气候变化和生态毒性的影响较大，其主要影响均来自复合空白带的生产，以及盖子、管肩和内衬的注塑成型。每个铝塑复合软管和全塑复合软管分别消耗2.53，2.18 MJ的初级能源，排放123，70.5 g影响气候变化的气体，释放0.012，0.005生态毒性物质。结论 在所研究的系统边界内，铝塑复合软管对能源的消耗和对环境的影响均比全塑复合软管高。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The work aims to study the environmental impact of four production units of aluminum barrier laminated (ABL) tube and plastic barrier laminate (PBL) tube respectively, to provide references for the environmental impact assessment and process improvement of such packaging materials. The life cycle assessment (LCA) method was used to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze its impact on energy consumption and the environment. Through the eFootprint software, all life cycle assessments were completed online, including modeling, computational analysis and data quality assessment. According to LCA evaluation results, the two products had great impact on primary energy demand, climate change and eco-toxicity. The main impact came from production of composite blank web, injection molding of cap, shoulder and insert. Each ABL tube and PBL tube consumed 2.53, 2.18 MJ of primary energy, emitted 123, 70.5 g of gases that affected climate change, and released 0.012, 0.005 eco-toxic substances respectively. The conclusion is that within the boundary of the system studied, aluminum barrier laminate tube has higher impact on energy consumption and environment than plastic barrier laminated tube. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
渝公网安备 50010702501716号