李良春,关继成,刘仲权,鲁军,高飞,牛正一.基于FAHP的军品包装外包商的选择[J].包装工程,2016,37(1):56-60.
LI Liang-chun,GUAN Ji-cheng,LIU Zhong-quan,LU Jun,GAO Fei,NIU Zheng-yi.Outsourcers Selection of Military Packaging Based on FAHP[J].Packaging Engineering,2016,37(1):56-60. |
| 基于FAHP的军品包装外包商的选择 |
| Outsourcers Selection of Military Packaging Based on FAHP |
| 投稿时间：2015-07-21 修订日期：2016-01-10 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 军事外包 FAHP 外包商的选择与评价 |
| 英文关键词: military outsourcing FAHP outsourcer selection and evaluation |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: |
| 全文下载次数: |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 确定军品包装外包商评价指标权重。方法 尝试根据军品包装外包的特殊性， 建立一个包含企业绩效、 生产能力、 研发能力、 风险、 资质认证和环境条件在内的指标评价体系， 用模糊层次分析法FAHP法求出军品包装外包商的评价指标权重。结果 综合权重较大的4项指标分别为企业信誉、质量、 质量资格认证和生产状况。其中企业信誉所占权重最大， 为 0.168， 其次是质量， 综合权重为0.096， 质量资格认证和生产状况均为0.08。结论 企业信誉、 质量、 质量资格认证和生产状况等4项指标在选择军品包装外包商时应优先考虑。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The aim of this study was to determine the weight value of evaluation indicators of military packaging outsourcers. According to the particularity of military packaging outsourcing, an evaluation index system containing enterprise performance, productivity, R & D capabilities, risks, qualification and environment was established, and the weight value of evaluation indicators of military packaging outsourcers were calculated by FAHP. The four indicators with relatively high comprehensive weight were corporate reputation, quality, quality certification and production status, wherein the indicator with the largest comprehensive weight value (0.168) was corporate reputation, followed by quality with a comprehensive weight value of 0.096, and then quality certification and production conditions, both with a comprehensive weight value of 0.08. The four indicators of corporate reputation, quality, quality certification and production status should be given priority in the selection of military packaging outsourcers. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
渝公网安备 50010702501716号